--- title: Threat Model outline: deep --- # Threat Model This document outlines the security threats, assets, and mitigations for the Task project. It serves as a high-level, public guide and is published as part of our commitment to transparency. ## Asset Inventory ### Critical Assets - **Source Code:** The Task CLI, build scripts, and configuration files (e.g., `Taskfile.yml`, `.goreleaser.yml`). - **Build Artifacts:** Compiled binaries, packages, and containers distributed to users. - **Secrets:** API tokens, signing keys, and repository credentials used in CI/CD and release pipelines. - **Release Metadata:** Version numbers, changelogs, and checksums. - **CI/CD Pipelines & Runners:** GitHub Actions workflows that build, test, and release the project. - **Third-party Dependencies:** Go modules and tools used to build and distribute Task. - **Website & Documentation:** The taskfile.dev site and installation scripts. ### Asset Locations - Local developer machines - GitHub Actions runners - GitHub Releases - Public package registries (npm, Homebrew, Winget, Cloudsmith) - Source control platforms (GitHub) - Netlify (website hosting) ## Threat Model ### Actors - **Maintainers & Contributors:** Trusted users with varying levels of repository access. - **External Attackers:** Untrusted users seeking to compromise builds, releases, or user systems. - **Supply Chain Threats:** Malicious dependencies or compromised third-party services. - **CI/CD Systems:** Automated agents that may be exploited if misconfigured. ### Entry Points - Source code contributions (pull requests, issues) - Configuration files and build scripts - CI/CD integration and environment variables - Third-party dependencies - Release pipelines and artifact repositories - Remote Taskfile fetching (HTTP, Git) - Installation scripts ### Trust Boundaries - Between the project repository and the CI/CD environment - Between Task and remote Taskfiles fetched over the network - Between artifact generation and distribution channels - Between the Task binary and user-defined shell commands ### Threats #### Supply Chain Attacks - Compromised Go dependencies or build tools - Unauthorized changes to source code or configuration - Exploitation of third-party CI/CD or package registry services - Compromised installation scripts or distribution channels #### Secrets Leakage - Exposure of tokens, credentials, or signing keys in logs, error messages, or artifacts - Hardcoded secrets in code or configuration - Improper secret management in CI/CD environments #### Code Execution / Injection - Malicious code execution via compromised pull requests or dependencies - Remote code execution vulnerabilities in Task or its dependencies - **Note:** Task intentionally executes user-defined shell commands as part of its core functionality. Users are responsible for the commands they define in their Taskfiles. #### Unauthorized Access - Unauthorized users triggering releases or accessing sensitive artifacts - Insecure permissions on runners, repositories, or artifact stores - Compromised maintainer accounts #### Data Integrity & Tampering - Tampering with build artifacts, changelogs, or metadata - Compromise of signing keys, leading to malicious releases - Man-in-the-middle attacks against remote Taskfile fetching #### Denial of Service - Abuse of CI/CD resources, bandwidth, or artifact storage - Overloading automated processes or API endpoints - Malicious Taskfiles designed to exhaust system resources ## Mitigations ### Supply Chain Security - Pin dependencies and use trusted sources - Mandatory code review and CI checks on all incoming pull requests - Signed commits and release tags - Enable immutable releases where supported - Run `govulncheck` on every commit and tag - Pin GitHub Actions to specific commit SHAs ### Secrets Management - Secure storage using GitHub Secrets - Never log or expose secrets in build or release outputs - Regularly rotate secrets and monitor for suspicious activity - Use least-privilege tokens scoped to specific repositories ### Secure Code Execution - Validate and sanitize configuration files and user inputs - Audit dependencies for vulnerabilities - HTTP is rejected for remote Taskfiles by default (requires `--insecure` flag) - TLS certificate verification for remote Git repositories ### Access Control - Enforce least privilege for CI/CD runners, repositories, and artifact stores - Require multi-factor authentication for maintainers - Restrict release triggers to tagged releases only - Lower permissions of less active maintainers ### Artifact Integrity - Generate checksums for all release artifacts - Distribute artifacts via trusted, access-controlled repositories - Verify signatures and checksums in installation scripts where possible ### Availability Protection - Implement rate limiting and resource quotas on CI/CD jobs - Monitor for abnormal activity and automate alerts - Set timeouts on network operations (e.g., remote Taskfile fetching) ## Residual Risks - Zero-day vulnerabilities in dependencies, CI/CD systems, or Task itself - Social engineering attacks targeting maintainers - Unnoticed supply chain compromises - Human error in configuration or secret management - Users fetching malicious remote Taskfiles from untrusted sources ## Security Best Practices - Regularly update dependencies and build tools - Monitor security advisories and patch vulnerabilities promptly - Educate contributors on secure coding and secrets hygiene - Document security policies and incident response procedures ## References - [Task Documentation](https://taskfile.dev/) - [Incident Response Plan](./incident-response-plan) - [OWASP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/) - [Supply Chain Security](https://slsa.dev/) - [GitHub Security Best Practices](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security)