Backport #27291 by @silverwind
Previously, the production build never output sourcemaps. Now we emit
one file for `index.js` because it is the most likely one where we need
to be able to better debug reported issues like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27213. This will currently
increase the binary size of gitea by around 700kB which is what the
gzipped source map file has.
Also, I fixed the CSS sourcemap generation which was broken since the
introduction of lightningcss.
The chinese docs are machine-translated, please correct accordingly.
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Previously, the production build never output sourcemaps. Now we emit
one file for `index.js` because it is the most likely one where we need
to be able to better debug reported issues like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27213. This will currently
increase the binary size of gitea by around 700kB which is what the
gzipped source map file has.
Also, I fixed the CSS sourcemap generation which was broken since the
introduction of lightningcss.
Backport #27126 by @Zettat123
Related to #27039
The `ref` property in Gitea Actions is different from GitHub Actions.
This PR improves the documentation to explain the difference.
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
WIP because:
- [x] Some calls set a `content-type` but send no body, can likely
remove the header
- [x] Need to check whether `charset=utf-8` has any significance on the
webauthn calls, I assume not as it is the default for json content.
- [x] Maybe `no-restricted-globals` is better for eslint, but will
require a lot of duplication in the yaml or moving eslint config to a
`.js` extension.
- [x] Maybe export `request` as `fetch`, shadowing the global.
Closes#26329
This PR adds the ability to ignore revisions specified in the
`.git-blame-ignore-revs` file in the root of the repository.
The banner is displayed in this case. I intentionally did not add a UI
way to bypass the ignore file (same behaviour as Github) but you can add
`?bypass-blame-ignore=true` to the url manually.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Hello,
The current package guide for cargo gives you only the git index, with
the HTTP Index stabilized being used as default for crates.io and being
better for most use-cases.
However, it's not documented that gitea supports the sparse spec, and it
does not require the _crates-index git repo for the sparse api.
I personally think we should push users to use the sparse instead of the
git repository. (Even let users disable crates-index repos if they only
want to use sparse)
Backport #26999
If the AppURL(ROOT_URL) is an HTTPS URL, then the COOKIE_SECURE's
default value should be true.
And, if a user visits an "http" site with "https" AppURL, they won't be
able to login, and they should have been warned. The only problem is
that the "language" can't be set either in such case, while I think it
is not a serious problem, and it could be fixed easily if needed.
If the AppURL(ROOT_URL) is an HTTPS URL, then the COOKIE_SECURE's
default value should be true.
And, if a user visits an "http" site with "https" AppURL, they won't be
able to login, and they should have been warned. The only problem is
that the "language" can't be set either in such case, while I think it
is not a serious problem, and it could be fixed easily if needed.
1. Introduce lightweight `fetch` wrapper functions that automatically
sets csfr token, content-type and use it in `RepoActionView.vue`.
2. Fix a specific issue on `RepoActionView.vue` where a fetch network
error is shortly visible during page reload sometimes. It can be
reproduced by F5-in in quick succession on the actions view page and was
also producing a red error box on the page.
Once approved, we can replace all current `fetch` uses in UI with this
in another PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This feature was removed by #22219 to avoid possible CSRF attack.
This PR takes reverseproxy auth for API back but with default disabled.
To prevent possbile CSRF attack, the responsibility will be the
reverseproxy but not Gitea itself.
For those want to enable this `ENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_API`,
they should know what they are doing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Currently, Artifact does not have an expiration and automatic cleanup
mechanism, and this feature needs to be added. It contains the following
key points:
- [x] add global artifact retention days option in config file. Default
value is 90 days.
- [x] add cron task to clean up expired artifacts. It should run once a
day.
- [x] support custom retention period from `retention-days: 5` in
`upload-artifact@v3`.
- [x] artifacts link in actions view should be non-clickable text when
expired.
Backport #26883
This change was caused by #26271, for configuration as below:
```
[attachment]
ENABLE = true
PATH = data/attachments
MAX_SIZE = 100
MAX_FILES = 5
```
Before #26271, the resolved path is ${AppWorkPath}/${attachments.PATH}
(such as `/var/lib/gitea/data/attachments`)
After #26271, the resolved path is ${AppDataPath}/${attachments.PATH}
(such as `/var/lib/gitea/data/data/attachments`)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/26864 Follow
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26271
This change was caused by #26271, for configuration as below:
```
[attachment]
ENABLE = true
PATH = data/attachments
MAX_SIZE = 100
MAX_FILES = 5
```
Before #26271, the resolved path is ${AppWorkPath}/${attachments.PATH}
(such as `/var/lib/gitea/data/attachments`)
After #26271, the resolved path is ${AppDataPath}/${attachments.PATH}
(such as `/var/lib/gitea/data/data/attachments`)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/26864
Follow https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26271
Backport #26382 by @jolheiser
This PR adds our matrix space to the support options and alphabetizes
the list.
I also considered adding our Mastodon, however that isn't as suitable as
the other options because it's just whoever has access to the account vs
a community chat/forum.
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Backport #26690 by @thomas-mc-work
… because it doesn't require a separate shell, spawning a process which
cost unnecessary resources and takes time.
Co-authored-by: Thomas McWork <thomas.mc.work@posteo.de>
